Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Permanent respiratory damage in ~2% of survivors is catastrophic as well.


Is there data to back this up? It would be very early to make specific declarations of the after effects of an illness that sprang in to existence 3 months ago.


I would expect doctors are able to make kinda accurate diagnostics on damaged lungs and have already lots of data on recovery prospects. Might not be 1% exact, but they are probably not on the wrong side either.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: