Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | greazy's commentslogin

That's the job of uBlock origin.

Eg here's a list

https://github.com/laylavish/uBlockOrigin-HUGE-AI-Blocklist#...


Android allows custom keyboards. I like fleksy a lot but it hasn't been updated in ages with bugs creeping in.

iOS kind of does as well. But it's the bar above the keyboard that grinds my gears. Of course it was added in the sloppy liquid 'ass updates. https://discussions.apple.com/thread/256177528?sortBy=rank

Check out Klava for iOS – got BlackBerry, Windows Phone-inspired looks and so on https://apps.apple.com/gb/app/klava-keyboard/id6756861211

Plus customisations and BlackBerry 10-like predictive system


Have you tried Futo Keyboard? https://keyboard.futo.org/

Can it do swipe typing in multiple languages without having to manually switch? It's something that Google keyboard does really well, i have it set to 3 languages at the same time. Haven't found any other keyboard that can do that.

It's good but unfortunately doesn't support the same swipe features of fleksy. The swipe left to delete, swipe up or down for change or remember words are extremely useful.

Hope FUTO supports it in the future


No! Trailing it out now...

I propose a sub section of Betteridge's law of headlines: If an article states "x is making a come back" the answer is usually no it's not.

Very nitpicky but because I spend a lot of time plotting data: don't arbitrarily color the bar plots without at least mentioning cut offs. Why 19% is orange and 20% is green is a mystery.

It's a pretty common threshold, like 10% is. Be it the 80/20 "Pareto" rule, it's the value of one finger on one hand, or if you really want you stretch the p-value of 0.05 is 1 in 20 odds but that's definitely a stretch though arbitrary anyways. But 20 is a very human number and very common. It's just a division of 5 rather than 4 (I'm assuming you wouldn't have questioned a cutoff at 25%)

You've missed my point, it's not the thresholds, it's the categories assigned to the thresholds that need explaining.

You're right and I still don't understand your point.

> Blockchain tech is part of my religious beliefs.

What are your religious beliefs? I'm intrigued to hear more.


I believe the monetary system is broken and creates asymmetric monetary playing fields based on distance from monetary injection points (banks and governments). The tax system makes it hard for each unit of currency to travel far from a 'money printer'. After just 6 hops, a dollar is taxed down to about 10 cents; so people who are more than 6 hops from a money printer live in a much more scarce monetary environment than people who are in the front row. It's Cantillon effects on steroids. It means that the entire economy has become a kind of social climbing game to get closer to the money printers. I feel that this game is immoral and people shouldn't be forced to participate. Private currencies should be protected by law.

I essentially believe that the economy is fake. That people get money due to mostly social factors and then make up plausible narratives to explain their success in a way which omits all the critical social elements... And these explanations sound plausible to people in their social circle who are at a similar distance from a money printer so the false beliefs and perceptive distortions are socially validated.

I also believe I'm being persecuted and algorithms are suppressing me for seeing through the scheme and for my ability to explain complex issues simply.


This is different than a belief system protected by anti discrimination laws

That sounds like a belief, but not necessarily a religious belief.

Why not? There is a ceremonial aspect to it whereby I frequently comment on social media and news sites to preach my gospel.

Also, I believe the people at the top are the devil so you could argue there is an overlap with mainstream religion.


> Why not?

Lack of a belief in one or more divine beings or divine actions.


While

  While many approaches to religion exclude nontheism by definition, some inclusive definitions of religion show how religious practice and belief do not depend on the presence of a god or gods.
~ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nontheistic_religion

is a thing, it's also worth recalling that some out there do seemingly ascribe divine powers to piles of gold and silver.

Is blockchain fervor another whirling of Dervishes?


> While many approaches to religion exclude nontheism by definition, some inclusive definitions of religion show how religious practice and belief do not depend on the presence of a god or gods.

Look, I didn't say there has to be a belief in a divine being, I said

>> Lack of a belief in one or more divine beings or divine actions.

You have not expressed any belief in divine actions, divine interventions or even a divine design, so I find it pretty hard to consider it a religion with the way religions are currently recognised, formally or informally.


> You have not expressed any belief in divine actions, ..

because _I_ have none .. but this isn't about _me_, is it?

Check the user names upthread.


They did, with the caveat that its solved" for most use cases".

https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/head-of-claude-code-what-...


I would have expected the non-solved-cases to be the relatively unique ones, but considering the plethora of both A) non-Electron desktop apps, and B) coding agents (Copilot/Windsurf/Cursor/Codex/OpenCode/Qwen/Amazon Kiro/Devin/JetBrains AI/Gemini CLI/Gemini Code Assist/Antigravity/Warp/Kilocode/Cline/RooCode/Atlassian Rovo/Claude Code/etc), it seems like neither of the building blocks is very rare - perhaps Claude is just incapable of putting it together?

How the hell does someone come up with a probability like this? It's such bullshit, a telltale sign is the whole numbers used.

It's not based on anything but gut feeling, which is fine. Just state so.


No. It was developed as a general purpose language.

I think you are conflating the development of Servo with the design and development of Rust.


> FDA took issue with the “comparator” in its clinical trial — the vaccine the company used as a benchmark to evaluate its own shot.

> FDA said the use of the standard flu shot as a comparator “does not reflect the best-available standard of care.” The standard flu shot is FDA-approved.

The standard flu vaccine using inactivated virus grown in eggs is a very good comparator.

Please elaborate further, currently you are acting more mysterious than helpful.


Ads, like AI, subsumes the product in which its embedded in.

OpenAI is now an ads company.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: