This contributor to the talk page will appreciate no such thing:
this whole article is poorly veiled propaganda by the current communist administration to justify government ownership of roads. After all, who but the government could remove a link to benefit "everyone"? By generating this absurd fake propaganda, it hopes to ply public sympathy toward state involvement and ownership. Naturally the actual proposed "facts" are totally rubbish: it is obvious that you could never decrease traffic congestion in an area by removing already congested roads.
The article is an obvious hoax from the first sentence: "Braess's paradox, credited to the mathematician Dietrich Braess" redlinks.
I've added a deletion tag. 82.113.121.167 (talk) 01:27, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
I am always amazed that people with such thought processes are not locked in padded cells, or at least taken to some provincial farmhouse to rest for a while before returning to society.
this whole article is poorly veiled propaganda by the current communist administration to justify government ownership of roads. After all, who but the government could remove a link to benefit "everyone"? By generating this absurd fake propaganda, it hopes to ply public sympathy toward state involvement and ownership. Naturally the actual proposed "facts" are totally rubbish: it is obvious that you could never decrease traffic congestion in an area by removing already congested roads. The article is an obvious hoax from the first sentence: "Braess's paradox, credited to the mathematician Dietrich Braess" redlinks. I've added a deletion tag. 82.113.121.167 (talk) 01:27, 31 March 2010 (UTC)