I guess continuous research and investment in higher margin and specialized LEDs can help maintain your market share and profits.
Making 5mm, 3528 or 5050 is like being Walmart.
Making new substrates that are a few percent more efficient or high reliability can let you charge a lot more when the buyer will have them on 24/7, harsh environments or expensive-to-replace installs.
I just wish the automobile LED retrofit market was more advanced.
Most newer non-LED cars will report bulb faults because LED resistance is too low. The workaround of a resistor seems to defeat the purpose. Reprogramming ECUs is a pain.
You’d think someone would sell a competitive kit for common cars that do it all, but they seem non-existent.
Reducing electrical loads by a few hundred watts should pay for itself over a few years if you drive enough.
I wish we could regulate the CRI and color temp of LEDs sold for headlights. I've had a few dangerous situations at night because of some idiot with poorly aimed, blue-white LEDs. I thought it was well known that lower color temps reflect less off moisture and perform better as headlights? I worry we may be causing eye issues by blasting people with intense blue light when their eyes are adjusted for darkness.
Not related with car headlights, but related to temperature:
3 days ago I learned prefer blue light in some of the rooms in house. Apparently yellow is sheepish, blue is good for reading. My theory was: southerners prefer blue, people with little sun exposure - yellow.
I dunno... I think I used to prefer 2700k at home and now I'm settling on 3300k, although sometimes even that seems frustratingly yellow now. I'm getting older and presbyopia is really setting in now. I'm from CA(formerly southern, now the bay area).
Except it wont be fixed because many don't see it as flickers, most don't find it annoying, and the people making the purchasing decision only cares about cost and not quality.
>The workaround of a resistor seems to defeat the purpose.
P=VI.
I=V/R.
V=12 => P=24/R.
I don't quite understand how a resistor defeats the purpose of LEDs, they're more efficient because you get more light per watt not because resistance is low.
Likely talking about load resistors that are installed in parallel with the LEDs, converting energy to heat solely for the purpose of making the "incandescent bulb is bad" sensor happy.
The sensor is looking at current draw. If it's too low, it assumes a burned out incandescent. Basically, the LEDs are too efficient and look like a burned bulb. The resistor in parallel draws enough current to make it happy.
Most likely it. Just like with solar, while the future orders volume is not threatened any much, a lot of suppliers had no plan what to do after the initial adoption rush ends. A lot of manufacturers jumped on LED market just for that early inrush
It’d be nice if China ever paid attention to demand and stopped overproducing every good they can, leading to stockpiles that will likely just end up in landfills.
eBay is full of Soviet new-old stock Nixie tubes. In the future it could be obsolete Chinese LEDs that everyone’s buying up to make “retro” digital clocks from.
I guess continuous research and investment in higher margin and specialized LEDs can help maintain your market share and profits.
Making 5mm, 3528 or 5050 is like being Walmart.
Making new substrates that are a few percent more efficient or high reliability can let you charge a lot more when the buyer will have them on 24/7, harsh environments or expensive-to-replace installs.