Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

By 2014 NN folks, of which I was one for a decade by that point, were solving real world problems at above human capabilities.

We'd been managing around human capabilities since around 2004 in certain tasks.

There were actual industrial applications in 1994.

You'd have to go back to the 1950s to find the type of research in neural networks that was of no practical application to anyone but NN researchers.



So go back to the 1950s and the point stands. What does it matter when the actual start date is in terms of the point being right or wrong?


> So go back to the 1950s and the point stands.

Yes. "Quantum computers will revolutionize computing by year 2100" is a claim I can take seriously. "Quantum computers will revolutionize computing real soon now" is a claim I am not taking seriously.

And yes, the 1950s AI researchers also boasted that it would take only months, what ended up taking many decades: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dartmouth_workshop


So quantum computers will be relavent in some time around 2075.

How much money should we putting into something with a time horizon longer than the working careers of everyone here?


Nobody wants your money


I'd like a rebate on my taxes then.


Well I'll be dead by that timeline so it matters a little.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: