Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

LOL making one db service a central point of failure, charge gold for small compute instances. Rage about needing Multi AZ, make the costs come onto the developer/organization. But, now fail on a region level, so are we going to now have multi-country setup for simple small applications?


According to their status page the fault was in DNS lookup of the Dynamo services.

Everything depends on DNS....


Dynamo had a outage last year if I recall correctly.


Lol ... of course it's DNS fault again.


We maybe distributed, but we die united...


Divided we stand,

United we fall.


AWS Communist Cloud


>circa 2005: Score:5, Funny on Slashdot

>circa 2025: grayed out on Hacker News


This is not Slashdot which is quite a good thing. Not that poignant humor is not always unwelcome, IMHO.


upvote :this


I thought it was a pretty well-known issue that the rest of AWS depends on us-east-1 working. Basically any other AWS region can get hit by a meteor without bringing down everything else – except us-east-1.


But it seems like only us-east-1 is down today, is that right?


Some global services have control plane located only in `us-east-1`, without which they become read-only at best, or even fail outright.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/whitepapers/latest/aws-fault-iso...


It's not DNS

There's no way it's DNS

It was DNS


Just don't buy it if you don't want it. No one is forced to buy this stuff.


> No one is forced to buy this stuff.

Actually, many companies are de facto forced to do that, for various reasons.


How so?


Certification, for one. Governments will mandate 'x, y and/or z' and only the big providers are able to deliver.


That is not the same as mandating AWS, it just means certain levels of redundancy. There are no requirements to be in the cloud.


No, that's not what it means.

It means that in order to be certified you have to use providers that in turn are certified or you will have to prove that you have all of your ducks in a row and that goes way beyond certain levels of redundancy, to the point that most companies just give up and use a cloud solution because they have enough headaches just getting their internal processes aligned with various certification requirements.

Medical, banking, insurance to name just a couple are heavily regulated and to suggest that it 'just means certain levels of redundancy' is a very uninformed take.


It is definitely not true that only big companies can do this. It is true that every regulation added adds to the power of big companies, which explains some regulation, but it is definitely possible to do a lot of things yourself and evidence that you've done it.

What's more likely for medical at least is that if you make your own app, that your customers will want to install it into their AWS/Azure instance, and so you have to support them.


Security/compliance theater for one


That's not a company being forced to, though?


It is if they want to win contracts


I don't think that's true. I think a company can choose to outsource that stuff to a cloud provider or not, but they can still choose.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: