Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This is a very strong, explicit statement in response to someone using the term rather casually. Can you explain why you are so sure?

I do think you need to define 'comprehension' in order to be certain. A statement fitting the form of "it doesn't comprehend, it just X" is incomplete, because it fails to explain why X is not a valid instance of comprehension.





Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: